BitStarz vs BC.Game
BitStarz says verification is obligatory rather than discretionary, which BC.Game does not, and gives up the crypto-only balance model and sportsbook BC.Game carries.
Written by the editorial desk/Last checked:
Reads operator documents and records what they say
BitStarz against BC.Game, side by side
| BitStarz | BC.Game | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Anjouan Gaming Board |
| Licence no. | OGL/2024/165/0185 | ALSI-202410011-FI1 |
| Register status | Active | VALID |
| Providers | 62 | Not published |
| Coins | Not verified | Not published |
| Stated KYC threshold | Discretionary | Discretionary |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Read from each operator’s own terms and licence register. A blank means the document does not state it, or we have not read it — never that the answer is nil.
BitStarz describes verification as an obligatory player procedure. Most brands here, BC.Game included, reserve the power and leave the ordinary case unstated, so this is a real difference in posture even though no amount is attached to it.
The rest of the file is a sixty-two-studio roster and an active Curaçao certificate. Coins, ceiling, founding year and clause number are all blank — as most of them are for BC.Game.
Verification stated as obligatory
The terms establish identity verification as an obligatory procedure. The casino may require proof of identity, proof of payment and proof of address, and may ask for further documentation at its sole discretion or during deposits.
Two things follow. A player should expect to verify rather than hope not to, and the trigger can arrive on the deposit side, not only at payout. BC.Game's section 6 states neither, so it is vaguer and, for anyone hoping to avoid documents, misleadingly so.
Sixty-two studios, and where they overlap
The roster names Playtech, Playson, Novomatic, Yggdrasil, Thunderkick, Endorphina, Betsoft Gaming, BGaming, Evoplay, ELK, Hacksaw, Amatic, Belatra, Mascot and Platipus, with rarer entries including Delulu Gaming, EXCO, JINX Gaming, Slightly Edgy, Nownow and Zerplaaygames.
Thirty-eight of the sixty-two also appear at Wild.io and thirty-three at Playbet.io — around six in ten. Notably it shares only twenty-one with BetFury, so the catalogue is not simply a copy of the largest lobbies. BC.Game's roster is unread, so the count stands unopposed.
An active certificate, checked off the operator's site
BitStarz holds OGL/2024/165/0185 from the Curaçao Gaming Authority, marked Active, with a per-certificate reference on the authority's own register rather than a link back to bitstarz.com.
BC.Game's route is different and equally solid: ALSI-202410011-FI1 from Anjouan, validated for bc.game on 27 August 2026. Its former Curaçao licence, OGL/2023/118/0060, is returned by the Curaçao register as revoked and is not the current permit. The licence page is where this site records the territorial side of both permits.
Two feature tags against BC.Game's five
Original games and a VIP programme. There is no sportsbook line, no live-dealer tag, no crypto-only balance model and no provably fair designation on BitStarz's record.
The original-games tag is the one that matches BC.Game directly — both run in-house titles. But BC.Game additionally describes how its results are made verifiable, through a chain of ten million pre-generated hashes released one per round, and BitStarz's file contains no equivalent.
Pros
- Describes verification as an obligatory procedure rather than a reserved power
- Names sixty-two studios, where BC.Game's provider roster is unread
- Certificate OGL/2024/165/0185 is marked Active and resolves on the Curaçao register
- Carries an original-games tag, the same in-house claim BC.Game makes
Cons
- No clause number is cited, so the verification rule cannot be quoted precisely
- Documents can be requested during deposits, not only before withdrawals
- No coin list has been read, so the cashier cannot be checked
- No withdrawal ceiling and no founding year appear on the record
- Two feature tags, with no sportsbook, live dealer or provably fair line
Questions people ask
- Is KYC mandatory at BitStarz?
Its terms establish verification as an obligatory procedure and allow proof of identity, payment and address to be required, including during deposits. BC.Game reserves the same power in section 6 without saying whether it applies to everyone.
- How many studios does BitStarz carry?
Sixty-two are named, with thirty-eight of them also at Wild.io. It shares only twenty-one with BetFury, so the lobby is less derivative than most. BC.Game's roster has not been read by this site.
- Does BitStarz have a sportsbook?
No sportsbook tag appears on its record, where BC.Game's does. BitStarz's two tags are original games and a VIP programme.
BitStarz · BC Game alternatives