Fairspin vs BC.Game
Fairspin publishes the second-largest catalogue here and a five-day document deadline, giving a reader two concrete things BC.Game's file does not contain.
Written by the editorial desk/Last checked:
Reads operator documents and records what they say
Fairspin against BC.Game, side by side
| Fairspin | BC.Game | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Anjouan Gaming Board | Anjouan Gaming Board |
| Licence no. | ALSI-202508047-FI2 | ALSI-202410011-FI1 |
| Register status | valid | VALID |
| Providers | 114 | Not published |
| Coins | Not verified | Not published |
| Stated KYC threshold | Discretionary | Discretionary |
| Withdrawal cap | Not verified | Not published |
| Since | Not verified | Not published |
Read from each operator’s own terms and licence register. A blank means the document does not state it, or we have not read it — never that the answer is nil.
Fairspin names 114 game studios, second only to Bitcasino.io among the forty ranked brands, and unusually for a large lobby its roster overlaps the other big catalogues less than half the time.
It also does something almost no one else here does: it puts a clock on verification. Clause 7.6 gives five days to supply requested documents. That is a deadline running against the player rather than the operator, but it is at least a stated interval, and BC.Game states none.
114 studios, and a genuinely distinct lobby
The list includes Evolution, Pragmatic Play, Play'n GO, NetEnt, Microgaming, Novomatic, NoLimit City, Hacksaw Gaming, Red Tiger, Yggdrasil and Playtech-adjacent names, alongside unusual entries such as Buck Stakes Entertainment, Igrosoft, Macaw Gaming, Snowborn Studios, Triple Profits Games and Zeus Play.
Fifty-six of the 114 also appear at Bitcasino.io and fifty-six at Sportsbet.io — under half, where those two share eighty-nine per cent with each other. So more than sixty studios here are outside the common pool. BC.Game's roster is unread, so the comparison is a large distinct catalogue against no catalogue.
Clause 7.6, and the five-day clock
Fairspin may request documents and information for a verification check at its discretion, including when considering a refund request, and the user must supply them within five days.
A deadline cuts both ways. It tells a player exactly how long they have, which is more than most terms here manage, and it makes a slow response a breach rather than an inconvenience. BC.Game's section 6 sets no interval at all, so a request there is open-ended in both directions.
A licence number Weiss quotes too
Fairspin holds ALSI-202508047-FI2 from the Anjouan Gaming Board with a status of valid. Weiss quotes the same number. That is a master-licence structure and it is weak evidence: it shows two brands under one permit, not that either owns the other, and this page asserts no ownership.
It is worth knowing for a practical reason. The certificate that clears Fairspin clears Weiss with the same document, and Weiss publishes no studio list at all — so the shared licence tells a reader nothing about whether the two lobbies resemble each other.
How the licence evidence compares
The reference this site holds for Fairspin is the Anjouan board's public register index rather than a lookup keyed to fairspin.io. BC.Game's ALSI-202410011-FI1 goes through a validation endpoint keyed to bc.game and returned valid on 27 August 2026.
Same authority, same kind of status word, different specificity. BC.Game's is the check that resolves to a result about one domain, which is the narrow advantage it holds over most of the fifteen Anjouan-licensed brands ranked here.
No coins, no cap, no year
No coin list has been read for Fairspin, no withdrawal ceiling is published and no founding year appears. Those three blanks match BC.Game's exactly, so on the cashier, on payout limits and on trading history neither brand can be checked.
That reduces the comparison to the catalogue and the deadline. Both favour Fairspin, and neither tells a reader what they can actually take out.
Pros
- Names 114 studios, second only to Bitcasino.io among the forty ranked brands
- More than sixty of those studios sit outside the common pool shared by the biggest lobbies
- Cites clause 7.6 and states a five-day window for supplying documents
- Anjouan licence ALSI-202508047-FI2 carries a status of valid
Cons
- The five-day deadline runs against the player, with no matching deadline on the operator
- The licence number is shared with Weiss, so the certificate is not brand-specific
- No coin list has been read, so the cashier is as unverifiable as BC.Game's
- No withdrawal ceiling is published, unlike the eight ranked brands that state one
- No founding year is published, so the operator's age cannot be established
Questions people ask
- How long does Fairspin give me to send documents?
Five days, under clause 7.6. That is a stated interval, which BC.Game's terms do not provide — its section 6 sets no window at all, in either direction.
- Is Fairspin's game selection different from the other big lobbies?
More than most. Only fifty-six of its 114 studios appear at Bitcasino.io, against the eighty-nine per cent overlap between Bitcasino.io and Sportsbet.io. BC.Game's roster is unread, so it cannot be compared at all.
- Why do Fairspin and Weiss share a licence number?
Both quote ALSI-202508047-FI2, which indicates a master-licence structure. It is weak evidence about how the brands are arranged and none at all about who owns them, and this page makes no ownership claim.
Fairspin · BC Game alternative